Oracle Instant Client

Oracle has come up with a client package that does not involve 700MB of unnecessary crap in order to install 150MB of redundant crap. They call this the Oracle Instant Client. Bear in mind that this is Oracle’s idea of instant.

After you register with the Oracle Technology Network, download four zip files, and decompress them, there are certain steps that must be taken to actually make this work, except they don’t.

The Right Price Point

For those of you with available SBC DSL, the price is right: $19.95.

Effective Monday, Nov. 1, SBC Yahoo! DSL will be available for $19.95 a month for new DSL residential customers who commit to a one-year term and subscribe to the popular SBC unlimited local and long distance calling plan, All Distance.

Unfortunately the price is only available to new customers. Other than that, this is an excellent move to increase market penetration.

Our price competition is not CATV, but dial access. Unmetered dial-up access in combination with flat-rate local phone call pricing is functionally identical, for most purposes, to any form of broadband. It’s sufficient, so customers are not willing to pay the $20-$29 marginal cost of changing service.

Aside from the price, the only barrier left to adoption is actual availability.

Fishy Communications

The girls were playing with some shells the other day, and the Big Sister tells the Little Sister,

Here, talk to Nemo.

The Little Sister holds the shell up to her ear to listen to the sounds of the ocean.

Hi! Nemo!

“Whatcha doin?” we ask. The Little Sister answers.

Tal king shell phone.

Warring Tribes

I started reading When Jesus Became God the other day. It strikes me as the story begins that, while the details differ, people change very little over time. We tend to kill each other over faith, over quibbles about the nature of our god. Yet those quibbles change over time, as one warring tribe wins over another.

These semantic differences are enough to set tribes apart. And tribes, set apart, attack the Other.

We also kill over the color of our sox.

A Faith that Admits No Question

Ron Suskind wrote, in The New York Times Magazine, a disturbing examination of President Bush’s faith. One of the many Mr. Suskind spoke with was Jim Wallis, of the Sojourners, who had worked with Mr. President during the transition. The article concludes

[Bush’s conversation with God] is what Jim Wallis wishes he could sit and talk about with George W. Bush. That’s impossible now, he says. He is no longer invited to the White House.

“Faith can cut in so many ways,” he said. “If you’re penitent and not triumphal, it can move us to repentence and accountability and help us reach for something higher than ourselves. That can be a powerful thing…. But when it’s designed to certify our righteousness — that can be a dangerous thing. Then it pushes self-criticism aside. There’s no reflection.

“Where people often get lost is on this very point,” he said after a moment of thought. “Real faith, you see, leads us to deeper reflection and not — not ever — to the thing we as humans so very much want.”

And what is that?

“Easy certainty.”

Word of Mouth Advertising

since you’ve been using A9.com recently, virtually everything at Amazon.com is automatically an additional Ï€/2% (1.57%) off for you. Collecting this discount is zero effort on your part. It will be applied automatically at checkout (it will happen whether you use the shopping cart or our 1-Click Shopping®). You don’t need to do anything to get this discount except keep using A9.com as your regular search engine.

We don’t advertise this additional discount that we give in exchange for using A9.com, so if you want your friends to know about it, please tell them.

The Intelligence Community

Perhaps the 9/11 Commission should have hired Valdis Krebs before making its recommendation on how to refine the nomenklatura. Its difficult to see how the so-called intelligence community can be a community if they do not communicate. Inserting a new director above the incommunicado factions does not much improve the lines of communication between those groups.

Interestingly enough, the structure of our intelligence organizations was strongly influenced, not just by turfwars as usual, but by a President seeking to keep them off-balance, and revised by Congress in response to certain behaviors against the citizenry, most often associated with another President though by no means confined to his administration.

So People Want to Live in the Burbs?

The price of a good will reflect demand for that good.

But John Tierney appears have forgotten Econ. 101, if he ever knew it.

We have our house for sale. It’s a 3 bedroom, 1 bath, ranch, in Mahopac, New York, about 60 miles north of the City. We’re asking $379,000. As you move closer to the City, selling prices increase. A two-story Cape Cod, of about the same age and with similar amenities to ours, but on 1/4 acre and in Yorktown Heights, 12 miles south of us, was offered for $450,000. A two-bedroom, 1 bath, 900 sq. ft. cottage on less than 1/4 acre in the village of Katonah was listed for $475,000. Listings in southern Westchester for similar properties are even higher. Similar properties in the city list for seven digits.

This pattern is not peculiar to New York, nor is it confined to large cities. All other things being equal, village homes are worth more than others.

What does this tell us? That demand exceeds supply. We’re given no details of the survey of preferences which Mr. Tierney cites in stating that 85% of people prefer suburban homes. Extrapolating from myself, what we say we prefer is more for our dollar: If I’m paying 7 figures, I damn well want a godawful huge monstrousity. Given small apartment A, in poor school system A, for $500,000; or large house B, with a lawn, in highly-regarded school system B, for $500,000, buyers prefer to say B.

If 85% of people did hate them, urban properties would be cheaper.

Zero down with no interest for 30 years!

The Mortgages weblog notes a fiscally irresponsible proposal by the current administration to permit Federal insurance of mortgages granted with no money down.

The problem here is not so much with the reduced down payment, but with the insurance. The initial lender assumes no risk for the failure of the loan, and so has no incentive to ensure that the borrower is able to repay the debt. The Federal government, in its infinite wisdom, will pay the lender, either on default or by reducing the costs of transferring the loan. Which means that we will be paying the lender.